Core i5 |
您所在的位置：网站首页 › amd pro a10-8700b r6 › Core i5 |
|
Core i5-8265U vs Pro A10-8700B
Aggregated performance score
Pro A10-8700B20154 cores / 4 threads
1.43
Core i5-8265U20184 cores / 8 threads
3.87
+171%
i3-12100F
i5-13600K
i9-14900KS
Ryzen 5 5500
Ryzen 5 7500F
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by a whopping 171% based on our aggregated benchmark results. Contents Primary details Detailed specifications Compatibility Supported technologies RAM capacity and type Integrated graphics cards Performance benchmarks Gaming capabilities Pros & cons summary Vote for your favorite Similar processor comparisons Community ratings Questions & comments Pro A10-8700B i5-8265U Primary detailsComparing Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Place in performance ranking20861363Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100Market segmentLaptopLaptopSeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Core i5Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Release date3 June 2015 (8 years ago)1 October 2018 (5 years ago)Launch price (MSRP)no data$297Current price$326 $630 (2.1x MSRP) Detailed specificationsPro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)Threads48Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHzBoost clock speed3.2 GHz3.9 GHzL1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)Chip lithography28 nm14 nmDie sizeno data123 mm2Maximum core temperatureno data100 °CMaximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °CNumber of transistors3100 Millionno data64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility-+Unlocked multiplierNoNo CompatibilityInformation on Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1SocketFP4FCBGA1528Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt15 Watt Technologies and extensionsTechnological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2AES-NI1+FMAFMA4no dataAVXAVX+FRTC1no dataFreeSync1no dataPowerTune-no dataTrueAudio+no dataPowerNow+no dataPowerGating+no dataOut-of-band client management+no dataVirusProtect+no dataRAID+no dataHSA+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+Speed Shiftno data+My WiFino data+Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+TSXno data-Idle Statesno data+Thermal Monitoringno data+Flex Memory Accessno data+SIPPno data-Smart Responseno data+Statusno dataDiscontinued Security technologiesPro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. TXTno data-EDBno data+Secure Keyno data+Identity Protectionno data+SGXno dataYes with Intel® MEOS Guardno data+ Virtualization technologiesVirtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U are enumerated here. AMD-V1+VT-dno data+VT-xno data+EPTno data+IOMMU 2.0+no data Memory specsTypes, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported. Supported memory typesDDR3/DDR3L-2133DDR4Maximum memory sizeno data64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidthno data37.5 GB/sECC memory supportno data- Graphics specificationsGeneral parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® ProcessorsiGPU core count6no dataNumber of pipelines384no dataMax video memoryno data32 GBQuick Sync Videono data+Clear Videono data+Clear Video HDno data+Enduro+no dataSwitchable graphics1no dataUVD+no dataVCE+no dataGraphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz Graphics interfacesAvailable interfaces and connections of Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs. Number of displays supportedno data3eDPno data+DisplayPort++HDMI++DVIno data+ Graphics image qualityMaximum display resolutions supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. 4K resolution supportno data+Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24HzMax resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60HzMax resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz Graphics API supportAPIs supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. DirectXDirectX® 1212OpenGLno data4.5Vulkan1no data PeripheralsSpecifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U. PCIe version3.03.0PCI Express lanesno data16 Synthetic benchmark performanceVarious benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Pro A10-8700B 1.43 i5-8265U 3.87 +171%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 171% based on our aggregated benchmark results. PassmarkPassmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Benchmark coverage: 68% Pro A10-8700B 2217 i5-8265U 5983 +170%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 170% in Passmark. GeekBench 5 Single-CoreGeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core. Benchmark coverage: 42% Pro A10-8700B 474 i5-8265U 720 +51.9%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 52% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core. GeekBench 5 Multi-CoreGeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores. Benchmark coverage: 42% Pro A10-8700B 999 i5-8265U 2272 +127%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 127% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core. Cinebench 10 32-bit single-coreCinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle. Benchmark coverage: 20% Pro A10-8700B 2200 i5-8265U 6082 +176%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 176% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core. Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Benchmark coverage: 19% Pro A10-8700B 5907 i5-8265U 19418 +229%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 229% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core. 3DMark06 CPU3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package. Benchmark coverage: 19% Pro A10-8700B 2798 i5-8265U 6316 +126%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 126% in 3DMark06 CPU. wPrime 32wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Benchmark coverage: 18% Pro A10-8700B 30.7 i5-8265U 11.02 +179%Pro A10-8700B outperforms Core i5-8265U by 179% in wPrime 32. Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Benchmark coverage: 17% Pro A10-8700B 2 i5-8265U 6 +151%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 151% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core. Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-coreCinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Benchmark coverage: 15% Pro A10-8700B 192 i5-8265U 602 +213%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 213% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core. Cinebench 15 64-bit single-coreCinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 15% Pro A10-8700B 70 i5-8265U 159 +127%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 127% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core. Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-coreCinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 14% Pro A10-8700B 0.82 i5-8265U 1.78 +117%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 117% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core. TrueCrypt AESTrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Pro A10-8700B 0.9 i5-8265U 4.4 +418%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 418% in TrueCrypt AES. WinRAR 4.0WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Pro A10-8700B 897 i5-8265U 3988 +345%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 345% in WinRAR 4.0. x264 encoding pass 1x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Pro A10-8700B 45 i5-8265U 156 +244%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 244% in x264 encoding pass 1. x264 encoding pass 2x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% Pro A10-8700B 9 i5-8265U 39 +331%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 331% in x264 encoding pass 2. Geekbench 3 32-bit single-coreBenchmark coverage: 5% Pro A10-8700B 950 i5-8265U 3679 +287%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 287% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core. Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-coreBenchmark coverage: 5% Pro A10-8700B 2728 i5-8265U 14002 +413%Core i5-8265U outperforms Pro A10-8700B by 413% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core. Gaming performance Pros & cons summary Performance score 1.43 3.87 Recency 3 June 2015 1 October 2018 Threads 4 8 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 WattThe Core i5-8265U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A10-8700B in performance tests. Should you still have questions on choice between Pro A10-8700B and Core i5-8265U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Vote for your favoriteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU. Pro A10-8700B Core i5-8265U Like Like Similar processor comparisonsWe picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Pro A10 8700B vs Pro A8 8600B Core i5 8265U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U Pro A10 8700B vs Pentium 4415U Pro A10 8700B vs Core i3 8145U Community ratingsHere you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. 3.6 49 votesRate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.9 1021 voteRate Core i5-8265U on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions & commentsHere you can ask a question about Pro A10-8700B or Core i5-8265U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS |
今日新闻 |
推荐新闻 |
| CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3 |